kevincasper.net

she’s been on the trail for several weeks. she has had very little off the cuff interaction with the press (by very little i mean, like, none). she made a comment in her first interview that alaska’s physical proximity to russia gave her foreign policy experience. this comment raised eyebrows, got some negative press.

ok … that’s the setup.

this woman is running for vice president for a party that has about $75 million in the bank. they can’t continue to not let her talk to the press. so in the two weeks since her last interview, one can assume that every speechwriter, talking point creator, rhetorical expert on the campaign’s staff has been prepping her, not only for her next interview, but, primarily, for this specific fucking question. you could have bet the farm, your life savings, your dog, your balls, and you wife’s sweet ass on this one. sure as the sun will rise, this question was going to be asked EXACTLY as it was asked.

ok … keeping all that in mind, let’s consider the text.

this is the response that made it to the air. we are seeing a mind at work here. this is a practiced, rehearsed, educated, trained mind in the process of performing the exact work that she does for a living. this is a national politician of a major party answering the one question in the universe that she absolutely knew was going to be asked of her. this is her monologue, her important scene in the school play, her time for the floor, her moment in the sun.

when we consider all of this systematically, we can see that, without being flippant or reducing the situation down to some kind of off the cuff derogatory response, what we’re dealing with here is a really, really stupid cunt. really, this is one dumb cunt.

and for my feminist sisters out there who might object to the language choice, you don’t have to be a woman to be a cunt. jr. bush is, arguably, an even dumber cunt. but this sarah palin, i don’t know, she’s no richard nixon or margaret thatcher. she’s a really dumb cunt.

the debate i really want to see is jr. bush and sarah palin. with mark twain as the moderator. and jenna jamison shooting red, white and blue roman candles out of her pussy during the intermissions. that i would enjoy.

god bless america.

*** as a post script, an interesting exercise would be to watch the above sarah palin interview and then watch the interview a few posts down with keith richards. watch both interviews and ask yourself, honestly, who makes more sense? if you were doing some kind of group work at your job, who do you think would make the best group leader? if you were on a jury, which one do you think would perform the job at hand with the most competence? i’m being very serious here … and don’t take visuals into account. i mean, palin’s got those smoking hot glasses and those pert tittie balls, our boy keith doesn’t stand a fucking chance. keith looks like something sarah palin would pull out of a dead moose’s pussy for fuck’s sake. but try to get beyond all that and just listen to their words, try to get a sense of the mind behind them. pretty fascinating shit … ***

Tags: 4 Comments