<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: still feel gone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevincasper.net/still-feel-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevincasper.net/still-feel-gone/</link>
	<description>language, pictures, and music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://kevincasper.net/still-feel-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevincasper.net/?p=1478#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>survivor is classic.  no question.  but farrar&#039;s shit on those early records isn&#039;t going anywhere.  that guy had it going back then like nobody&#039;s business.  tweedy ... late bloomer, apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>survivor is classic.  no question.  but farrar&#8217;s shit on those early records isn&#8217;t going anywhere.  that guy had it going back then like nobody&#8217;s business.  tweedy &#8230; late bloomer, apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadskis</title>
		<link>http://kevincasper.net/still-feel-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>nadskis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevincasper.net/?p=1478#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>pretty good story, white. but i still the one where you reviewed survivor better. 

i&#039;m not quite sure if uncle tupelo&#039;s stuff will stand the test of time like, say, eye of the tiger. i&#039;m actually being 75% serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty good story, white. but i still the one where you reviewed survivor better. </p>
<p>i&#8217;m not quite sure if uncle tupelo&#8217;s stuff will stand the test of time like, say, eye of the tiger. i&#8217;m actually being 75% serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

